Archive for category movies

X-Men First Class: Mutant TV

After I saw Wolverine: Origins, I actually defended it. Kind of. I said that it was so haphazard, nonsensical, and oddly-shaped it provided perhaps the most accurate recreation of what it’s like read mainstream superhero comics. In two hours, it made me feel like I’d read a year’s worth of issues in one sitting – with a few different writers, some rushed fill-in art, and a helping of editorial interference.

Now X-Men: First Class achieves something similar, only much more successfully. A 1960s-set prequel to Bryan Singer’s first two X-Men movies – with Singer back on board with a story credit and as producer – this is a welcome return to the thematic material that makes mutant stories interesting.

Admittedly the characters are sometimes forced to announce these themes out loud, but that’s a small price to pay.

Director Matthew Vaughn (Kick Ass) does very well in some smaller moments, especially in the striking reverse-angle transformation of an innocuous office to a torture chamber; he also knows that the movie’s power comes from James McAvoy’s Charles and Michael Fassbender’s Erik, and the scenes they share are the movie’s highlights. If only the same could be said for January Jones as Emma Frost, who is embarrassingly lifeless here. The comic book version of Emma would be appalled by this pretender wearing her lingerie.

Vaughn struggles in the movie’s special effects-heavy sequences, though. Towards the end, things take on the look of a big-budget Smallville finale. That’s not a compliment. (I know fans, situated both in and out of Hollywood, can easily become obsessed with fidelity to their source material. I maybe just fell prey to it talking about Emma Frost, above. But including Banshee’s flying-with-flappy-wings-and-screaming-towards-the-ground? Yeah, that was never going to work.)

In fact, the whole movie looks a little cheap. A little made-for-TV. And that got me thinking: why not?

In some ways, First Class does mimic the structure and feel of comic books. For example, it begins with the same sequence that brutally kicked off Singer’s first X-Men film, and then adds another twist to it. This is common practice in comics as new writers pick apart heroes’ origin stories, always returning to embroider them with new, painful details. But with its small-screen spectacle, cast of thousands, and overstuffed plot – this ends up feeling less like comic books and more like mutant television.

As critic Paul Verhoeven wrote in his review: “Really, what they should have done was give it the Game of Thrones treatment and make a big, detailed, character-driven story all about the early Academy days.”

I couldn’t agree more. Charles and Erik, travelling the globe, recruiting mutants! Having zany adventures and philosophical disagreements on their ideological differences! Killing an occasional nazi along the way! That’s a season’s worth of entertainment even before they begin their mutant academy and lifelong rivalry. As enjoyable as this movie is, its second half feels like a clipshow of episode highlights to come.

Watching First Class also made me realise something has shifted in what I want from TV and what I want from film. It’s now television that seems to give me stories with truly epic scope. At the cinema, I’m leaning towards more singular spaces, driven less by narrative and more by a character’s subjectivity or particular mood.

It also made me realise, as so much television now looks so ‘cinematic’, I should probably stop saying ‘made-for-TV’.  Then again, ‘straight-to-video’ is still in my vocabulary…

, , , , ,

6 Comments

I Love You Phillip Morris: jmag review

Here’s my quick triple j magazine review of I Love You Phillip Morris, finally stumbling into Australian theatres after an embarrassingly long wait. I wish I could say I found it worth waiting for; the true story it’s based on is certainly a fascinating one.

I LOVE YOU PHILLIP MORRIS

Directors: Glenn Ficarra & John Requa

Starring: Jim Carrey, Ewan McGregor, Leslie Mann

Country: USA

FYI: I Love You Phillip Morris isn’t viral marketing for cigarettes.

It’s a comedy featuring major stars that’s taken two years to get a limited Australian release. Why? Maybe because it’s about a gay romance. I wanted to fall in love with this movie on principle – but despite being fast and fun, it’s missing something fundamental.

Steven Russell (Jim Carey) is a con man who’s used to living lies. When he ends up in jail for insurance fraud – because “being gay is really expensive!” – he meets the softly-spoken Phillip Morris (Ewan Macgregor). They fall in love, and Steve promises that they’ll never be apart again.

In Phillip Morris, Jim Carey acts like he’s starring in a glib, old-fashioned farce. (Like Lisa Simpson says: “He can make you laugh with no more than a frantic flailing of his limbs!”) Unfortunately, Ewan McGregor plays his role as a real human being. Their two styles completely fail to mesh, and their romance seems like it’s between different cinematic species.

Other reviews this month: Biutiful and Brighton Rock in cinemas; Megamind, Unthinkable, and Doors doco When You’re Strange on DVD.

Issue #49 on sale now.

, , ,

No Comments

How To Succeed In Conceptual Sequels…

“Remember at the end of Friends when everything worked out great for everyone just before they hit 30?”

In Jeffrey Sconce’s piece Friends for Life, he shows how easy it is to convince ourselves that it’s Monica who now stars in TV’s Cougar Town and Chandler in Mr. Sunshine. Those two shows are, in fact, on at the same time. Sconce wonders “was this part of their divorce settlement – joint custody of Wednesdays at 9:30?”

I love conceptual faux-sequels like these. (Of course Walt from Breaking Bad is actually poor Hal from Malcolm in the Middle, a once-hapless father desperately trying over again with a new family!) A couple of years ago, I gave a few examples of these odd sequels for triple j magazine. Forgive this quick cut-and-paste:

THE OUTLAW JOSEY WALES (1976) -> UNFORGIVEN (1992)

This one is a gimme, really, as both films are directed by and star the David Bowie of Machismo, Clint Eastwood. Sure, every western is a kinda-maybe sequel to every other western – that’s how genre works – and Eastwood played variations on the same cool cowboy in a dozen films. None fit together better than these: Unforgiven’s William Munny is Josey Wales, unwillingly dragged back to killing all these years later. It’s all the more heartbreaking once you see it.

THE EXORCIST (1973) -> THE NINTH CONFIGURATION (1980)

Think past The Exorcist‘s  projectile vomit and crucifix masturbation to when a sleepwalking Regan warns an astronaut at a party that he’s “going to die up there”. Sure, there were a pair of different but equally poorly-received sequels to The Exorcist a few years back – but original Exorcist writer William Peter Blatty called his own cult movie, The Ninth Configuration, the real sequel. Why? It features that same astronaut, Captain Billy Cutshaw, admittedly played by another actor.

While I was preparing for a hosting gig at last month’s Castaway interview for ACMI, however, I discovered my favourite conceptual sequel of all time. Is this something everyone knew but me?

HOW TO SUCCEED IN BUSINESS WITHOUT REALLY TRYING (1967) -> MAD MEN (2007)

In How To Succeed In Business Without Really Trying, Robert Morse plays J. Pierpont Finch, a window-washer who bluffs his way – through the power of song! – to the top of a farcical corporation. He does it by way of the advertising department, even though the movie warns us that “advertising does something to men’s brains”.

Fast forward: the same Robert Morse plays Bertram Cooper, the enigmatic patriarch of advertising agency Sterling Cooper Draper Price, on AMC’s Mad Men.

Cooper’s secret history as window-washer J. Pierpont Finch isn’t just an amusing intertext. It actually provides Mad Men with new – some might say necessary – depth. Why does Cooper not care about Don Draper’s multiple identities? It’s because Cooper’s past is based on exactly the same brand of lies! “This country was built and run by worse stories,” he says, “than whatever you imagined to hear.”

At the end of How To Succeed…, Finch only saves himself from disaster by finally coming clean about his past. Will Don Draper find redemption the same way? Maybe. But he probably won’t sing about it.

, , , ,

4 Comments

The Messenger: jmag review

Here’s my apologetic review of The Messenger from the latest issue of triple j magazine. I somehow missed this entirely when it was playing in cinemas, and it turned out to be much more interesting than expected. (Also – just in case it kills you like it did me – hey, that’s Eli from Freaks and Geeks!)

THE MESSENGER

Director: Oren Moverman

Starring: Ben Foster, Samantha Morton, Woody Harrelson

Do you hate your job? Well, suck it up. In The Messenger, injured soldier Will Montgomery (Ben Foster) is assigned to one of the worst jobs on earth: the Casualty Notification Team that informs the next of kin that a loved one has died in combat. They’re tough, tattooed soldiers who stick expressionlessly to a script. (Rule #1: no hugging.)

Will is taught the ropes by an eccentric mentor, played by Woody Harrelson as 50% laid-back charmer, 50% snorting bull. He’s good, but I was more amazed by Ben Foster’s jittery performance as Ben. Even when he sweetly connects with a new widow (Samantha Morton), he never seems less than dangerous. Director Oren Moverman was a writer first (including penning the Bob Dylan kinda-but-not-really biopic I’m Not There) and he doesn’t rely on battle flashbacks for instant drama. He just lets the characters tell their stories in long, painful takes.

If you skipped The Messenger because you were expecting another preachy anti-war weepy – it’s not. It’s unpredictable, moving, often mesmerising.

Other reviews this month: a rave for Aronofsky’s Black Swan, a boo for Romero’s Survival of the Dead, and a suspicious ‘huh?’ for Catfish.

Issue #47 on sale now.

, , , ,

No Comments