<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zero Stars For Star Ratings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.martynpedler.com/2009/11/zero-stars-for-star-ratings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.martynpedler.com/2009/11/zero-stars-for-star-ratings/</link>
	<description>&#34;All I want is the answer to one simple question before I run screaming back to the bughouse. Is this real or isn&#039;t it?&#34; Cliff Steele, DOOM PATROL #21.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 06:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martyn</title>
		<link>http://www.martynpedler.com/2009/11/zero-stars-for-star-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Martyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martynpedler.com/?p=1008#comment-99</guid>
		<description>Manolis: That&#039;s actually a fantastically good point, and one that hadn&#039;t even occurred to me. I agree that reviews are always more interesting after the fact, though I don&#039;t mind a few thematic spoilers, I guess, so long as the critic is careful to not reveal the plot.

Maybe we need some kind of separation between pre-reviews (a quick teaser synopsis and &#039;yes it&#039;s worth your time&#039; assurance) and post-film critiques...

And Ian: I think you&#039;re onto something. Out of three instead of out of five, or more accurately, ten halves? I think I could probably make that work without too much pain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manolis: That&#8217;s actually a fantastically good point, and one that hadn&#8217;t even occurred to me. I agree that reviews are always more interesting after the fact, though I don&#8217;t mind a few thematic spoilers, I guess, so long as the critic is careful to not reveal the plot.</p>
<p>Maybe we need some kind of separation between pre-reviews (a quick teaser synopsis and &#8216;yes it&#8217;s worth your time&#8217; assurance) and post-film critiques&#8230;</p>
<p>And Ian: I think you&#8217;re onto something. Out of three instead of out of five, or more accurately, ten halves? I think I could probably make that work without too much pain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manolis</title>
		<link>http://www.martynpedler.com/2009/11/zero-stars-for-star-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Manolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martynpedler.com/?p=1008#comment-97</guid>
		<description>I never read a whole review before I&#039;ve seen a film. Generally speaking, I want to know nothing about the film except whether it&#039;s good or not before having seen it. Stars and the short comment, i.e. &quot;commendable crime thriller that keeps you guessing, 3.5 stars&quot;, is all I really want from a review.  

But I do love reading reviews after I&#039;ve seen a film. In fact, I go out of my way to find them if I thought it was a thoughtful or terrible film (I love reading critical film reviews and was disappointed to find not a single one critical of Beautiful Kate, which I hated immensely).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never read a whole review before I&#8217;ve seen a film. Generally speaking, I want to know nothing about the film except whether it&#8217;s good or not before having seen it. Stars and the short comment, i.e. &#8220;commendable crime thriller that keeps you guessing, 3.5 stars&#8221;, is all I really want from a review.  </p>
<p>But I do love reading reviews after I&#8217;ve seen a film. In fact, I go out of my way to find them if I thought it was a thoughtful or terrible film (I love reading critical film reviews and was disappointed to find not a single one critical of Beautiful Kate, which I hated immensely).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.martynpedler.com/2009/11/zero-stars-for-star-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martynpedler.com/?p=1008#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Sort of like grading students&#039; work. I know colleagues who grade papers like the Michelin critic and others who grade like you award stars.  My system: It sucks; It has redeeming qualities; it&#039;s amazing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sort of like grading students&#8217; work. I know colleagues who grade papers like the Michelin critic and others who grade like you award stars.  My system: It sucks; It has redeeming qualities; it&#8217;s amazing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

